Thanksgiving is here.
Technically, thanksgiving should always be here, don't you agree?
God gives us all things.
For all things we should be thankful.
Hell is the worst thing imaginable and unimaginable. We all deserve it. The mere fact that we are not suffering that fire is a fact that we should be immeasurably grateful for. No suffering or trial on this earth can compare to the suffer an torment awaiting the unbeliever in the depths of Hell. Nothing.
Today I weep tears of sorrow for those who reject God. They go to a place none can grasp. None can comprehend just how horrible it is. They don't think they deserve such a place, and yet who knows what tomorrow may bring? They may die in an instant, a puff of smoke gusted away by the wind; and they suffer an eternity of existence, alone, in flames that never die, never grow cold.
My own sin is so great I am crushed under the mountain of it. I can't take it, can't bear it, can't pay it. Yet God sent His Son to take that mountain. He crushed Himself under that mountain. He looked at me with forgiving eyes and said "It is finished." He bore the intensity of that flame, the weight of that pile, the fire of that wrath intended for my sin, and gave Himself to me...one who kicked Him in the face, one who spat on Him and beat Him even while He suffered for...me.
Lord...why?
I don't deserve this...I can't earn this...I am helpless before the eternity of Hell prepared for me, and I would go there full speed ahead if not for Your Son.
Look at me, trying to say what I can't say! Words can't express the thankfulness I feel. Mere language cannot communicate the debt of gratitude I owe. And yet I try. Lord...forgive me. Forgive me for my inexpressiveness.
Use me, Lord, to snatch others from this eternal fall.
If sinners go to Hell, let them leap over my body, with my hands clutching ever at their heels, crying out in Your name to stop. Begging them to turn.
Use me, Lord.
Monday, November 25, 2013
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Modesty
Be forewarned that this could get awkward. I think you should read on nonetheless, but be forewarned.
Part of this goes along with the other post I posted on sex. Modesty is a debated issue in Christian circles, and it's a serious topic. Perhaps not seriously considered enough - at least by most churches. The church I go to, thank God, has a very Biblical way of viewing the topic and I agree with them wholeheartedly.
To begin with, what is modesty? The ever-useful dictionary.com defines it as "Freedom from vanity, boastfulness, etc.; regard for decency of behavior, speech, dress, etc.; simplicity/moderation."
A fairly accurate definition, to be sure. Modesty does indeed have to do with how you behave - are you overly boastful? Rash? Hasty? In speech, are you clean? Encouraging? Thoughtful? In your dress, are you subdued? Or are you trying to show off?
I'll be focusing more on the 'dress' part of things here, but be aware that modesty, while certainly a show of behavior and character, is also a way of thinking. It's a heart issue. In the same way that if you honor a person with words but not thoughts, actions but not intentions, you in reality disrespect them; if you are only modest 'skin deep' as they say, you aren't really modest at all.
So how does modesty apply in particular to clothing?
Well, here's the thing. I'm a guy. I look around. I see things. And if you have taken a glance at just what our culture's like today, I'm sure you know just how bad things are...if, of course, you have a standard.
I'm going to get a little blunt now, so be warned.
First of all, guys are designed to be visual. That means, ladies, that we SEE THINGS. We are attracted and aroused sexually by what we see, which is why pornography is so prevalent. And it's not just skin, it's the entire form and shape you were given that attracts us.
I've been told time and time again that girls just aren't that aware of how visual guys can be. If you are a lady and are reading this post, thankyouthankyouthankyou. It's vital you gain an understanding of how us guys work sexually.
That being said, it should be obvious that the way you dress is vital in your interaction with us guys. If what you're wearing is provocative, guys will be judging you based on that. This sort of attention can get you into bad places and bad relationships.
So, girls. You know those jean shorts, that aren't really shorts? That come down, like, two inches?
Hate to break it to ya, but those are actually underwear. If you wouldn't like every guy you see looking at your panties, then don't wear those, please. Keep lower-body clothing at least close to the knee, either above or below it. Don't wear underwear.
As for shirts, I have one word for you...cleavage. If you can see any of it in the mirror, try something else. We good guys appreciate your sacrifice.
Another thing to consider would be tight clothes. Girls, God made you to be physically attractive. That's for sure. When you wear something that is form-fitting, it draws eyes. *buzzer* This means that leggings are off-limits by themselves for public use.
Notice, of course, I said public use. If you're at home, in the company of family or by yourself, then it's okay to be wearing something a little questionable as long as it's not flat-out underwear. Please, preserve your dignity. Nobody barring your husband or future husband needs to see that.
Again, girls, guys are very visual. They'll be looking at your body, and if you happen to be flashing too much of it - even by accident - they might lust after you, which Jesus tells us is a sin (Matt. 5:28, Ex. 20:14). Also to consider is the fact that sexual predators exist. You can protect yourself by simply wearing less revealing clothes; it's as easy as that.
Did I miss anything? Oh yeah, swimsuits. Two piece swimsuits are a no-no. Those aren't even swimsuits. They're underwear that is specially designed to wear in the shower. That's all they're good for. And even one-piece swimsuits are questionable sometimes. My advice? Get a swimshirt and good ol' trunks. Tuck the swimshirt in: you can even wear a one-piece swimsuit under it, to be double safe. We appreciate it.
In conclusion for the girls; if you can follow the above guidelines, I can pretty much guarantee you that you'll be safe from those jerks who just focus on how you look. We good guys salute you.
Now, guys. Girls may not be as visually sensitive, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to do whatever. Remember that modesty, while clothing is a large part of it, also applies to your attitude. Wearing jewelry is not necessarily bad, but way too much of it - especially if it's earrings - is *buzzer*. Also, don't go around shirtless if you're ripped. I know you may be thinking "Whaaat?" But think about it - you're just showing off. And girls can be turned on visually, though they don't have a majority wiring for it.
To add to this list would be 'swag'. Swag is, in essence, a plea for attention. "Hey! Look at me! I'm different! I'm cool!" This is, once again, an immodest attitude. Don't have swag. It's not cool, and it certainly won't get you in with the right people.
Anything else? Oh, yes, baggy pants. Guys...just...don't. Every single girl I've ever, ever met thinks it's stupid. And any guy with sense thinks it is as well.
I hope this was helpful, and if you have anything I should add, please tell me. Sayonara!
Part of this goes along with the other post I posted on sex. Modesty is a debated issue in Christian circles, and it's a serious topic. Perhaps not seriously considered enough - at least by most churches. The church I go to, thank God, has a very Biblical way of viewing the topic and I agree with them wholeheartedly.
To begin with, what is modesty? The ever-useful dictionary.com defines it as "Freedom from vanity, boastfulness, etc.; regard for decency of behavior, speech, dress, etc.; simplicity/moderation."
A fairly accurate definition, to be sure. Modesty does indeed have to do with how you behave - are you overly boastful? Rash? Hasty? In speech, are you clean? Encouraging? Thoughtful? In your dress, are you subdued? Or are you trying to show off?
I'll be focusing more on the 'dress' part of things here, but be aware that modesty, while certainly a show of behavior and character, is also a way of thinking. It's a heart issue. In the same way that if you honor a person with words but not thoughts, actions but not intentions, you in reality disrespect them; if you are only modest 'skin deep' as they say, you aren't really modest at all.
So how does modesty apply in particular to clothing?
Well, here's the thing. I'm a guy. I look around. I see things. And if you have taken a glance at just what our culture's like today, I'm sure you know just how bad things are...if, of course, you have a standard.
I'm going to get a little blunt now, so be warned.
First of all, guys are designed to be visual. That means, ladies, that we SEE THINGS. We are attracted and aroused sexually by what we see, which is why pornography is so prevalent. And it's not just skin, it's the entire form and shape you were given that attracts us.
I've been told time and time again that girls just aren't that aware of how visual guys can be. If you are a lady and are reading this post, thankyouthankyouthankyou. It's vital you gain an understanding of how us guys work sexually.
That being said, it should be obvious that the way you dress is vital in your interaction with us guys. If what you're wearing is provocative, guys will be judging you based on that. This sort of attention can get you into bad places and bad relationships.
So, girls. You know those jean shorts, that aren't really shorts? That come down, like, two inches?
Hate to break it to ya, but those are actually underwear. If you wouldn't like every guy you see looking at your panties, then don't wear those, please. Keep lower-body clothing at least close to the knee, either above or below it. Don't wear underwear.
As for shirts, I have one word for you...cleavage. If you can see any of it in the mirror, try something else. We good guys appreciate your sacrifice.
Another thing to consider would be tight clothes. Girls, God made you to be physically attractive. That's for sure. When you wear something that is form-fitting, it draws eyes. *buzzer* This means that leggings are off-limits by themselves for public use.
Notice, of course, I said public use. If you're at home, in the company of family or by yourself, then it's okay to be wearing something a little questionable as long as it's not flat-out underwear. Please, preserve your dignity. Nobody barring your husband or future husband needs to see that.
Again, girls, guys are very visual. They'll be looking at your body, and if you happen to be flashing too much of it - even by accident - they might lust after you, which Jesus tells us is a sin (Matt. 5:28, Ex. 20:14). Also to consider is the fact that sexual predators exist. You can protect yourself by simply wearing less revealing clothes; it's as easy as that.
Did I miss anything? Oh yeah, swimsuits. Two piece swimsuits are a no-no. Those aren't even swimsuits. They're underwear that is specially designed to wear in the shower. That's all they're good for. And even one-piece swimsuits are questionable sometimes. My advice? Get a swimshirt and good ol' trunks. Tuck the swimshirt in: you can even wear a one-piece swimsuit under it, to be double safe. We appreciate it.
In conclusion for the girls; if you can follow the above guidelines, I can pretty much guarantee you that you'll be safe from those jerks who just focus on how you look. We good guys salute you.
Now, guys. Girls may not be as visually sensitive, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to do whatever. Remember that modesty, while clothing is a large part of it, also applies to your attitude. Wearing jewelry is not necessarily bad, but way too much of it - especially if it's earrings - is *buzzer*. Also, don't go around shirtless if you're ripped. I know you may be thinking "Whaaat?" But think about it - you're just showing off. And girls can be turned on visually, though they don't have a majority wiring for it.
To add to this list would be 'swag'. Swag is, in essence, a plea for attention. "Hey! Look at me! I'm different! I'm cool!" This is, once again, an immodest attitude. Don't have swag. It's not cool, and it certainly won't get you in with the right people.
Anything else? Oh, yes, baggy pants. Guys...just...don't. Every single girl I've ever, ever met thinks it's stupid. And any guy with sense thinks it is as well.
I hope this was helpful, and if you have anything I should add, please tell me. Sayonara!
Friday, October 18, 2013
What goes in, comes out...
Language.
Have you heard it recently?
Of course you have.
No, no, I don't mean language as in the English language, I mean it as in swearing. Cursing. Cussing. French. Or however you care to term it.
If you live in America, chances are pretty close to 100% that you have a better swear bank than John Newton (Oh yes, he was a pretty...colorful character before his salvation). If you're a Christian, you shouldn't be using it.
Before I go any further, however, let me apologize for the times that I haven't been so discerning. I've used a lot of 'substitute' swear words - which I'll discuss in a minute - and I'll be working for the next couple of weeks on cleaning up my blogs and vocabulary. I'm really sorry if I made you stumble.
So, just what is swearing? Dictionary.com says it's "to use profane oaths or language." All right...so what's language? Again, dictionary.com defines it as "as system of formalized symbols, signs, sounds, gestures, or the like used or conceived as a means of communicating thought, emotion, etc."
If you read that definition correctly, it said that language - words - are used to communicate thought and emotion. The implication? That no matter what you're saying, the words don't matter - the emotion or intent behind them is what you're really communicating. This is where 'substitute' swear words lose their validity. You may think it's not as bad as an f-bomb, but you mean the same thing.
The Bible says (for you Christians out there reading this) in Ephesians 5:3-4 "But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks." (The italicized and bold words are my added emphasis)
Uncleanness or filthiness apply to more than just 'trash talk' but since we're focusing on language here, we'll just use that particular meaning. Foolish talking is basically what we like to term 'putting your foot in your mouth', and 'jesting' in this context means joking inappropriately.
Obviously, the Bible's against cursing. Yet many Christians just can't bite their tongue - I'm no exception, let me tell you. Many people make the argument "Culture determines the meaning of a word - so if I use one that doesn't have a bad connotation, then it's all right".
Sorry people, that doesn't work either. Like we've discussed, words convey intent, and no matter what the cultural definition, if you're using any word at all with a malevolent purpose, it's dirty language.
This is not to say, however, that you're totally free to use swear words if you don't mean bad things by them (which...is almost impossible to do). Our culture has put bad connotations to certain things, and if we use them freely - even if we don't mean bad - it will stain their perception of us. Of course, that doesn't apply to words like "God" and "Hell" because those are legitimate Christian terms that have been twisted by people.
All that to say: don't curse, people. Always be encouraging others. And let's you and I clean up our vocabulary, shall we?
Have you heard it recently?
Of course you have.
No, no, I don't mean language as in the English language, I mean it as in swearing. Cursing. Cussing. French. Or however you care to term it.
If you live in America, chances are pretty close to 100% that you have a better swear bank than John Newton (Oh yes, he was a pretty...colorful character before his salvation). If you're a Christian, you shouldn't be using it.
Before I go any further, however, let me apologize for the times that I haven't been so discerning. I've used a lot of 'substitute' swear words - which I'll discuss in a minute - and I'll be working for the next couple of weeks on cleaning up my blogs and vocabulary. I'm really sorry if I made you stumble.
So, just what is swearing? Dictionary.com says it's "to use profane oaths or language." All right...so what's language? Again, dictionary.com defines it as "as system of formalized symbols, signs, sounds, gestures, or the like used or conceived as a means of communicating thought, emotion, etc."
If you read that definition correctly, it said that language - words - are used to communicate thought and emotion. The implication? That no matter what you're saying, the words don't matter - the emotion or intent behind them is what you're really communicating. This is where 'substitute' swear words lose their validity. You may think it's not as bad as an f-bomb, but you mean the same thing.
The Bible says (for you Christians out there reading this) in Ephesians 5:3-4 "But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks." (The italicized and bold words are my added emphasis)
Uncleanness or filthiness apply to more than just 'trash talk' but since we're focusing on language here, we'll just use that particular meaning. Foolish talking is basically what we like to term 'putting your foot in your mouth', and 'jesting' in this context means joking inappropriately.
Obviously, the Bible's against cursing. Yet many Christians just can't bite their tongue - I'm no exception, let me tell you. Many people make the argument "Culture determines the meaning of a word - so if I use one that doesn't have a bad connotation, then it's all right".
Sorry people, that doesn't work either. Like we've discussed, words convey intent, and no matter what the cultural definition, if you're using any word at all with a malevolent purpose, it's dirty language.
This is not to say, however, that you're totally free to use swear words if you don't mean bad things by them (which...is almost impossible to do). Our culture has put bad connotations to certain things, and if we use them freely - even if we don't mean bad - it will stain their perception of us. Of course, that doesn't apply to words like "God" and "Hell" because those are legitimate Christian terms that have been twisted by people.
All that to say: don't curse, people. Always be encouraging others. And let's you and I clean up our vocabulary, shall we?
Virginity, and Why You Lost It
Sex.
Seeeeeeex.
Sexxxxxxxxxxx.
Ssssssssssssssssssex.
I have summed up 99.9% of culture today.
Ladies and Gents, there are many things I hate about this culture. Financial issues, relationship issues, immaturity issues, and all those worldviews are part of that 0.1 percent. The rest can be expressed in these words;
"Childhood? My dear and uneducated teen, there is no such thing. We violate you from the moment you are born. If you aren't fully revolving around getting laid, there's something wrong with you, and we shall fix it by throwing books, songs, radio, Disney, and other indoctrinated people at you. We will take the natural form of sexual pleasure and twist it, turn it, and squeeze it into every. Single. Thing you do, think, or see. In the name of Buddhism, Pseudo-Christianity, Evolution, and Postmodernism, Amen."
The world we live in is dark. It is twisted. I can't step into any city or public building without being reminded of just how much sex is thrust in our faces. I walk down the teen section at the library, draw my shoulders up and tuck in my chin, trying to flinch away from the sexual glaze that's literally radiating off every book or movie present.
This world has taken sex and distorted it so much it's hardly recognizable. The sanctity of marriage is lost in the stampede of hormone-rich, sexually awakening teens who absolutely must get it off with someone, whether they're seriously involved or not. Pornography saturates the internet like mines in a field, and you better tip-toe your way around or whoops, there it is...
And then, of course, there's homosexuality. The crowning achievement to our depravity. Guys with guys, girls with girls. I think it could be safe to say that if you are not actively opposed to gay marriage, you are not Christian. You're rejecting Genesis 2:24, which lays down the law for relationships of an intimate sense. Oh by the way, 'man' is a masculine term, which means they're talking about an actual guy. Wife is a feminine term, which specifically means girl. Canst thou disagree? If you do anyway, then you think the Bible - God's Word - is lying.
Even as soaked in sex as our culture is, there are still ways to avoid it where we can and fight it were we can't. Parental controls, my young teenage compatriots, are there to protect your eyes, ears, and heart. Whether they're for the computer or how you act in public. Respect them. And for the areas where depravity is unavoidable, we have the Bible to refute it and prayer to keep our mental walls standing.
Amen.
Seeeeeeex.
Sexxxxxxxxxxx.
Ssssssssssssssssssex.
I have summed up 99.9% of culture today.
Ladies and Gents, there are many things I hate about this culture. Financial issues, relationship issues, immaturity issues, and all those worldviews are part of that 0.1 percent. The rest can be expressed in these words;
"Childhood? My dear and uneducated teen, there is no such thing. We violate you from the moment you are born. If you aren't fully revolving around getting laid, there's something wrong with you, and we shall fix it by throwing books, songs, radio, Disney, and other indoctrinated people at you. We will take the natural form of sexual pleasure and twist it, turn it, and squeeze it into every. Single. Thing you do, think, or see. In the name of Buddhism, Pseudo-Christianity, Evolution, and Postmodernism, Amen."
The world we live in is dark. It is twisted. I can't step into any city or public building without being reminded of just how much sex is thrust in our faces. I walk down the teen section at the library, draw my shoulders up and tuck in my chin, trying to flinch away from the sexual glaze that's literally radiating off every book or movie present.
This world has taken sex and distorted it so much it's hardly recognizable. The sanctity of marriage is lost in the stampede of hormone-rich, sexually awakening teens who absolutely must get it off with someone, whether they're seriously involved or not. Pornography saturates the internet like mines in a field, and you better tip-toe your way around or whoops, there it is...
And then, of course, there's homosexuality. The crowning achievement to our depravity. Guys with guys, girls with girls. I think it could be safe to say that if you are not actively opposed to gay marriage, you are not Christian. You're rejecting Genesis 2:24, which lays down the law for relationships of an intimate sense. Oh by the way, 'man' is a masculine term, which means they're talking about an actual guy. Wife is a feminine term, which specifically means girl. Canst thou disagree? If you do anyway, then you think the Bible - God's Word - is lying.
Even as soaked in sex as our culture is, there are still ways to avoid it where we can and fight it were we can't. Parental controls, my young teenage compatriots, are there to protect your eyes, ears, and heart. Whether they're for the computer or how you act in public. Respect them. And for the areas where depravity is unavoidable, we have the Bible to refute it and prayer to keep our mental walls standing.
Amen.
Monday, August 26, 2013
The God Card
I've been raised in a Christian home for my entire life. Obviously, I have some presuppositions about life as a result. So prepare for bias.
Many, many debates have been waged over the belief that there is a God. Some despise the idea. Others embrace it. One concept or play I seem to see a lot with inexperienced Christian debaters is what I like to term 'the God Card'. The God Card is what happens when a person who believes in God is asked a question they don't know the answer to, so they say 'Well, only God knows', or 'God did' or 'God, in His infinite wisdom, knows better than us'.
This argument tends to turn staunch atheists and evolutionists mad. It makes them think that Christians are so close-minded and idiotic to merely attribute everything to one supernatural being. "Ridiculous! Unscientific!" They shout.
The thing is, atheist, that when you say that it shows that you don't have a big enough idea of our view of God. Listen for a moment, if you will. True Christians believe in a God that made the entire creation with his mere words. If you look closely at the intricate systematic complexion of this universe, you can't help but be amazed with how smoothly the gears of the world turn.
You yell "Unscientific" at us, but where does that come from? The thing is, it makes perfect sense that a being who has always existed, will always exist, is all-powerful all-knowing and all-present could create the masterpiece that is the universe. Even some evolutionists believe that something had to start life on earth, hence the 'alien' theory.
I would argue that the reason people get mad at the 'God Card' is because it totally works. It doesn't take a genius to know that there are things in this world beyond human comprehension. It also doesn't take a genius to see that the amazing complexity and detail of this universe could only reasonably be attributed to intelligent design. You don't see a computer and think it came together randomly: by the same logic, the creation is much, much more complicated than a mere computer. There is no way we could have 'happened' by random events.
Richard Dawkins, that famous atheist and fervent anti-theist was once asked this question: "What would you do if there was a God and you had to stand before Him one day, and He asked you 'What have you been doing, Richard? Why have you been so avidly opposed to Me?'" Dawkins smiled and answered "I would say 'Well, Sir, why did you not make yourself more apparent?'"
I am an avid believer of an almighty God. As thus, I can't help but wince at the wrath that is in store for Mr. Dawkins and all who reject the idea. God has given multiple evidences of His existence...in creation, in our sense of morality, in His word the Bible.
Guess you'd better make a choice. Will you take the risk of rejecting God, or not?
Many, many debates have been waged over the belief that there is a God. Some despise the idea. Others embrace it. One concept or play I seem to see a lot with inexperienced Christian debaters is what I like to term 'the God Card'. The God Card is what happens when a person who believes in God is asked a question they don't know the answer to, so they say 'Well, only God knows', or 'God did' or 'God, in His infinite wisdom, knows better than us'.
This argument tends to turn staunch atheists and evolutionists mad. It makes them think that Christians are so close-minded and idiotic to merely attribute everything to one supernatural being. "Ridiculous! Unscientific!" They shout.
The thing is, atheist, that when you say that it shows that you don't have a big enough idea of our view of God. Listen for a moment, if you will. True Christians believe in a God that made the entire creation with his mere words. If you look closely at the intricate systematic complexion of this universe, you can't help but be amazed with how smoothly the gears of the world turn.
You yell "Unscientific" at us, but where does that come from? The thing is, it makes perfect sense that a being who has always existed, will always exist, is all-powerful all-knowing and all-present could create the masterpiece that is the universe. Even some evolutionists believe that something had to start life on earth, hence the 'alien' theory.
I would argue that the reason people get mad at the 'God Card' is because it totally works. It doesn't take a genius to know that there are things in this world beyond human comprehension. It also doesn't take a genius to see that the amazing complexity and detail of this universe could only reasonably be attributed to intelligent design. You don't see a computer and think it came together randomly: by the same logic, the creation is much, much more complicated than a mere computer. There is no way we could have 'happened' by random events.
Richard Dawkins, that famous atheist and fervent anti-theist was once asked this question: "What would you do if there was a God and you had to stand before Him one day, and He asked you 'What have you been doing, Richard? Why have you been so avidly opposed to Me?'" Dawkins smiled and answered "I would say 'Well, Sir, why did you not make yourself more apparent?'"
I am an avid believer of an almighty God. As thus, I can't help but wince at the wrath that is in store for Mr. Dawkins and all who reject the idea. God has given multiple evidences of His existence...in creation, in our sense of morality, in His word the Bible.
Guess you'd better make a choice. Will you take the risk of rejecting God, or not?
Monday, August 12, 2013
Revenge
We live in a fallen world. People steal, rape, murder, and squabble. There is entirely too much hate in this world of ours.
Imagine seeing your family slaughtered before your eyes, helpless to do anything. Imagine watching those whom you care about most brutally murdered, lying in pools of their own blood. And imagine the murderer smiling at you in mockery while he's doing it.
As humans, the first feeling we might feel is shock. Then devastation, and overwhelming grief. And finally, devouring all those is a sense of rage, of anger. The person who has done this will pay, and I will bring justice, we might think.
The truth is, revenge is altogether different from justice. As Rachel Dawes from the movie 'Batman Begins' so glibly states "Justice is about balance, revenge is about making yourself feel better."
I've seen so many movies and read so many books where revenge is a prominent theme (in fact, I've written/am writing one or two). The character has a dark past and is an avenger, he/she will do whatever it takes to kill that one person(s) who ruined their lives. *coughSasukecough*
Revenge is stupid. Yes, it may be what the person deserves. Yes, you may feel a little better after killing them...for a time. But in the end, it results in a never-ending cycle of hatred. Retaliation meets retaliation, and the struggle escalates. It becomes a bloody mess.
And even after your revenge is accomplished, what then do you live for? If you have dedicated your life to the pursuit of one person, when he/she is gone, what then? There is a huge void filling you. Life is empty.
The Bible says "Revenge is Mine, I will repay, saith the Lord" (Romans 12). As a Christian, I know that no matter what crimes a person commits, he/she will ultimately be judged. And Hell awaits for those who do not repent.
Imagine seeing your family slaughtered before your eyes, helpless to do anything. Imagine watching those whom you care about most brutally murdered, lying in pools of their own blood. And imagine the murderer smiling at you in mockery while he's doing it.
As humans, the first feeling we might feel is shock. Then devastation, and overwhelming grief. And finally, devouring all those is a sense of rage, of anger. The person who has done this will pay, and I will bring justice, we might think.
The truth is, revenge is altogether different from justice. As Rachel Dawes from the movie 'Batman Begins' so glibly states "Justice is about balance, revenge is about making yourself feel better."
I've seen so many movies and read so many books where revenge is a prominent theme (in fact, I've written/am writing one or two). The character has a dark past and is an avenger, he/she will do whatever it takes to kill that one person(s) who ruined their lives. *coughSasukecough*
Revenge is stupid. Yes, it may be what the person deserves. Yes, you may feel a little better after killing them...for a time. But in the end, it results in a never-ending cycle of hatred. Retaliation meets retaliation, and the struggle escalates. It becomes a bloody mess.
And even after your revenge is accomplished, what then do you live for? If you have dedicated your life to the pursuit of one person, when he/she is gone, what then? There is a huge void filling you. Life is empty.
The Bible says "Revenge is Mine, I will repay, saith the Lord" (Romans 12). As a Christian, I know that no matter what crimes a person commits, he/she will ultimately be judged. And Hell awaits for those who do not repent.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Evolution
Many many people are being raised and taught evolution. It's all over public schools, it's seeping into government, family, and even churches.
To get this clear right away, I do not believe in evolution. I'll tell you a little more about why.
The leading order of evolution is natural selection, right? 'Survival of the Fittest'. That species have evolved, adapted to the environment, changed so as to become ideally suited to their surroundings.
Well, if that's true, why aren't we already dead?
We are very fragile beings. If we are at the top of the food chain - the most evolved creature out there - why don't we have iron skin, sharp claws, super strength, etc.? Wouldn't that help us more? Also, where did we get our ability to rationalize? Animals don't have that. They have a programmed set of responses, called 'instinct'. If you tell me that, well, 'rationality' is just another term for 'instinct', then why do humans make stupid decisions? Why do we commit suicide, elect Barak Obama, and eat horrible food?
People have been very staunch supporters of this evolutionist theory, namely natural selection. Allow me to list a couple names. Let's start with Adolf Hitler and Karl Marx.
Get the picture?
Also, if evolution is true, why does morality exist? Why is it wrong to kill another man? But Your Honor, he was weaker than me and thus weeded out by natural selection! Why is it wrong to steal? That cache of cash (see what I did there?) was more beneficial to me! Only the superior survive, right? Who cares about government! In order to ensure I'M the strongest I need to do what I want when I want it!
Again, if evolution is true, why does art exist? It's a waste of time! It uses up valuable rescources! We don't need it to become stronger! It doesn't do a thing in that area.
These are a few of the problems with evolution. I'm not going to go into the scientifical holes (geneology, paleontology, astrology, etc.) it possesses, because that would be too long. But even the above reasons by themselves are plenty to convince me evolution can't be the answer.
If, by the end of this, you're wanting to rip my eyeballs out, allow me to ask: why?
Is it, perhaps, because I'm right?
PSYCH!
Of course evolution is true. All you idiots who don't think it's the only answer to the origin of life shut up. I'm right and you're wrong. Lalalala I can't hear youuuuu!
To get this clear right away, I do not believe in evolution. I'll tell you a little more about why.
The leading order of evolution is natural selection, right? 'Survival of the Fittest'. That species have evolved, adapted to the environment, changed so as to become ideally suited to their surroundings.
Well, if that's true, why aren't we already dead?
We are very fragile beings. If we are at the top of the food chain - the most evolved creature out there - why don't we have iron skin, sharp claws, super strength, etc.? Wouldn't that help us more? Also, where did we get our ability to rationalize? Animals don't have that. They have a programmed set of responses, called 'instinct'. If you tell me that, well, 'rationality' is just another term for 'instinct', then why do humans make stupid decisions? Why do we commit suicide, elect Barak Obama, and eat horrible food?
People have been very staunch supporters of this evolutionist theory, namely natural selection. Allow me to list a couple names. Let's start with Adolf Hitler and Karl Marx.
Get the picture?
Also, if evolution is true, why does morality exist? Why is it wrong to kill another man? But Your Honor, he was weaker than me and thus weeded out by natural selection! Why is it wrong to steal? That cache of cash (see what I did there?) was more beneficial to me! Only the superior survive, right? Who cares about government! In order to ensure I'M the strongest I need to do what I want when I want it!
Again, if evolution is true, why does art exist? It's a waste of time! It uses up valuable rescources! We don't need it to become stronger! It doesn't do a thing in that area.
These are a few of the problems with evolution. I'm not going to go into the scientifical holes (geneology, paleontology, astrology, etc.) it possesses, because that would be too long. But even the above reasons by themselves are plenty to convince me evolution can't be the answer.
If, by the end of this, you're wanting to rip my eyeballs out, allow me to ask: why?
Is it, perhaps, because I'm right?
PSYCH!
Of course evolution is true. All you idiots who don't think it's the only answer to the origin of life shut up. I'm right and you're wrong. Lalalala I can't hear youuuuu!
After Life
One of the classical Christian evangelism questions is 'do you believe in a heaven or hell?' If the person answers 'yes', then we ask why. If they answer 'no', then we ask them 'what do you think will happen after you die?' and go from there.
To define, what is heaven? What is hell?
Heaven is the place in the afterlife that is complete and absolute bliss, perfection and happiness. Depending on your worldview, either only good people go there or everyone does.
Hell, on the other hand, is a place of torment, suffering, and horror. Only evil people go there.
Ladies and gents, let's stop right there. If you answered 'yes' to that first question, meditate with me.
If a heaven or hell exists, then there must be reasons why they exist. Christianity, of course, says God will eventually judge all mankind. Those who have confessed and believed in Jesus will stay with God in heaven. However, all those who have not will be cast into the depths of hell.
Imagine a place with no suffering. No sickness, disease, sorrow, anger, just joy and happiness. Absolute and utter perfection. No more stubbed toes and paper cuts. Imagine all this...for all eternity. Never bored, never unsatisfied, never discontent. Lovely thought, right?
Now, imagine another perfect place. You have a perfect body, you can't die. And for all eternity, you are burning in an eternal darkness, black flames eating away at your skin with agonizing pain, day after year after decade. Never easing, never getting used to it. There is nothing but silence, and pain.
It's a sobering thing, hell. People of this age toss the word around like a potato. "Hell no" "I sure as hell hope" "That was one hell of a time". They have no idea what they are talking about.
If you hate Christians who come knocking at your door (no, not Jehova's Witnesses or Mormons), or are handing out tracts, or merely shouting out in the square, don't get angry or annoyed. If Christianity is true and you aren't one of us, we believe you're headed for a place far worse than any nightmares can be or words convey. We are desperate to tell you how you can escape. Don't scorn: listen.
A famous philosopher once made a convincing argument for Christianity using logic. He said this:
"If I wager that there is a God and I'm right, then I gain eternity for believing in Him.
If I wager that there is a God and I'm wrong, then I lose nothing for having believed in Him.
If I wager that there is not a God and I'm right, then I lose nothing for not believing in Him.
If I wager that there is not a God and I'm wrong, then I lose eternity for not having believed in Him."
So,
Do you believe in a heaven or hell?
To define, what is heaven? What is hell?
Heaven is the place in the afterlife that is complete and absolute bliss, perfection and happiness. Depending on your worldview, either only good people go there or everyone does.
Hell, on the other hand, is a place of torment, suffering, and horror. Only evil people go there.
Ladies and gents, let's stop right there. If you answered 'yes' to that first question, meditate with me.
If a heaven or hell exists, then there must be reasons why they exist. Christianity, of course, says God will eventually judge all mankind. Those who have confessed and believed in Jesus will stay with God in heaven. However, all those who have not will be cast into the depths of hell.
Imagine a place with no suffering. No sickness, disease, sorrow, anger, just joy and happiness. Absolute and utter perfection. No more stubbed toes and paper cuts. Imagine all this...for all eternity. Never bored, never unsatisfied, never discontent. Lovely thought, right?
Now, imagine another perfect place. You have a perfect body, you can't die. And for all eternity, you are burning in an eternal darkness, black flames eating away at your skin with agonizing pain, day after year after decade. Never easing, never getting used to it. There is nothing but silence, and pain.
It's a sobering thing, hell. People of this age toss the word around like a potato. "Hell no" "I sure as hell hope" "That was one hell of a time". They have no idea what they are talking about.
If you hate Christians who come knocking at your door (no, not Jehova's Witnesses or Mormons), or are handing out tracts, or merely shouting out in the square, don't get angry or annoyed. If Christianity is true and you aren't one of us, we believe you're headed for a place far worse than any nightmares can be or words convey. We are desperate to tell you how you can escape. Don't scorn: listen.
A famous philosopher once made a convincing argument for Christianity using logic. He said this:
"If I wager that there is a God and I'm right, then I gain eternity for believing in Him.
If I wager that there is a God and I'm wrong, then I lose nothing for having believed in Him.
If I wager that there is not a God and I'm right, then I lose nothing for not believing in Him.
If I wager that there is not a God and I'm wrong, then I lose eternity for not having believed in Him."
So,
Do you believe in a heaven or hell?
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Critiquing Criticism
Before you get confused at the title of this post, allow me to define the two words that make its title.
While 'critique' and 'criticize' sound very similar, there is an important difference between the two. The act of critiquing is an unbiased, scientific evaluation, while criticism is inherently biased.
You've probably heard things like 'critics say' or the phrase 'critically acclaimed'. There is a whole group of people whose job is to observe and give information about stuff. They are supposed to be unbiased and factual...but in reality, that's just impossible. Bias will be there, no matter what.
Is criticism a good thing, however? The scientific method would disagree, because it says that scientists should put aside personal beliefs and evaluate the evidence, following it to the logical conclusion. Unfortunately, bias is impossible to filter out completely.
If at this point you're thinking 'yeah right! People are perfectly able to see things in a rational, logical fashion', allow me to elaborate. Bias, by definition, is your own opinion on the world. What you personally find or see as important, and how you think the universe works. It can be anything from Christianity to Evolution to I Do What I Want. It is, in a word, your 'worldview'.
To be completely without this worldview is impossible. People are perfectly capable of laying aside most of their presuppositions, but bias is present in every single thing we do. Do we get up on the right or left side of the bed? Your bias says 'right'. Why do we teach mathematics, science, and literature in school? Because our bias dictates those as important. Why do we label people as 'insane' or 'delusional'? Because their bias seems radical in light of ours. They merely have a different way they view this world than us, and to us it seems extreme.
If by now you're thinking that the scientific method seems ridiculous in light of this, calm down. Even with all the prejudice in the world, it is still possible to implement this method in some way, shape, and form. You see, the reason critics exist are to give views on different things. These views may be negative or positive. But by viewing them all, we can gain different and unique perspectives on different topics. Through doing this, we formulate our own opinion, bias, 'worldview'. By gathering all the observations on the evidence, we can formulate our own unique thought on what seems to fit the order of this world best. And these views are changeable. We cannot gather all the evidence, of course. Someone might come along with a better hypothesis that fits this world better. We should always be searching for what is the best fit for this world.
So to answer my previous question 'Is criticism a good thing?' the answer is yes. In fact, we ourselves should criticize. We should see what doesn't fit, and ask why.
I'm convinced that the phrase 'curiosity killed the cat' was a phrase formulated by early communists or dictators to keep people from being independent. When we begin to criticize, we begin to discover different things. In fact, here's something I want you to criticize.
Where do we get the concept of right and wrong? Is it just our own bias? If it is, it seems rather inconvenient for us as individuals!
If your worldview answers this question, then it sounds like you're on the right track.
While 'critique' and 'criticize' sound very similar, there is an important difference between the two. The act of critiquing is an unbiased, scientific evaluation, while criticism is inherently biased.
You've probably heard things like 'critics say' or the phrase 'critically acclaimed'. There is a whole group of people whose job is to observe and give information about stuff. They are supposed to be unbiased and factual...but in reality, that's just impossible. Bias will be there, no matter what.
Is criticism a good thing, however? The scientific method would disagree, because it says that scientists should put aside personal beliefs and evaluate the evidence, following it to the logical conclusion. Unfortunately, bias is impossible to filter out completely.
If at this point you're thinking 'yeah right! People are perfectly able to see things in a rational, logical fashion', allow me to elaborate. Bias, by definition, is your own opinion on the world. What you personally find or see as important, and how you think the universe works. It can be anything from Christianity to Evolution to I Do What I Want. It is, in a word, your 'worldview'.
To be completely without this worldview is impossible. People are perfectly capable of laying aside most of their presuppositions, but bias is present in every single thing we do. Do we get up on the right or left side of the bed? Your bias says 'right'. Why do we teach mathematics, science, and literature in school? Because our bias dictates those as important. Why do we label people as 'insane' or 'delusional'? Because their bias seems radical in light of ours. They merely have a different way they view this world than us, and to us it seems extreme.
If by now you're thinking that the scientific method seems ridiculous in light of this, calm down. Even with all the prejudice in the world, it is still possible to implement this method in some way, shape, and form. You see, the reason critics exist are to give views on different things. These views may be negative or positive. But by viewing them all, we can gain different and unique perspectives on different topics. Through doing this, we formulate our own opinion, bias, 'worldview'. By gathering all the observations on the evidence, we can formulate our own unique thought on what seems to fit the order of this world best. And these views are changeable. We cannot gather all the evidence, of course. Someone might come along with a better hypothesis that fits this world better. We should always be searching for what is the best fit for this world.
So to answer my previous question 'Is criticism a good thing?' the answer is yes. In fact, we ourselves should criticize. We should see what doesn't fit, and ask why.
I'm convinced that the phrase 'curiosity killed the cat' was a phrase formulated by early communists or dictators to keep people from being independent. When we begin to criticize, we begin to discover different things. In fact, here's something I want you to criticize.
Where do we get the concept of right and wrong? Is it just our own bias? If it is, it seems rather inconvenient for us as individuals!
If your worldview answers this question, then it sounds like you're on the right track.
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Guns
This is one of the hottest topics of the age. There is so much heat around the debate of the second amendment it's amazing.
Some people say that guns should be banned. They're too dangerous. They are purely for the purpose of causing death. They do nothing but help the cause of violence. (I'm going to ignore the reason that 'criminals use them so we should ban them' reason because it's stupid to the point of ridiculous)
Frankly, I regard that view as short-sighted (There's a pun in there somewhere). Too dangerous? Purely for killing? That's a pure example of generalization. Guns are tools of desctruction, to be sure (Oh yeah, I'm also ignoring the argument that 'guns kill people'. If guns kill people, then cars crash themselves, beer gets drunk, and toast toasts toast).
However, the reason weapons exist is because conflict exists. And I don't know about you, but if someone pointed a gun at my family, I'd want a gun to point back. To defend yourself against a power means you must have power of an equal level. That's what guns are for.
When people started using guns, the world became equal. Suddenly old men and young men no longer were separated in terms of strength. A 90 year old geezer could cut down a 20 year old buck with a mere trigger pull. But looking beyond that, the use of guns has revolutionized our defenses. When hostiles break into an old woman's home, all she must do is point a gun at them and assure them she knows how to shoot. "Let's talk about Jesus until the police arrive, honey."
If you are one of those people who think that guns should be banned because they cause deaths, let me remind you that people are at fault, not the weapons they use. Take all the weapons away from man and he will beat each other to death with his bare fists. Then what will you blame?
Some people say that guns should be banned. They're too dangerous. They are purely for the purpose of causing death. They do nothing but help the cause of violence. (I'm going to ignore the reason that 'criminals use them so we should ban them' reason because it's stupid to the point of ridiculous)
Frankly, I regard that view as short-sighted (There's a pun in there somewhere). Too dangerous? Purely for killing? That's a pure example of generalization. Guns are tools of desctruction, to be sure (Oh yeah, I'm also ignoring the argument that 'guns kill people'. If guns kill people, then cars crash themselves, beer gets drunk, and toast toasts toast).
However, the reason weapons exist is because conflict exists. And I don't know about you, but if someone pointed a gun at my family, I'd want a gun to point back. To defend yourself against a power means you must have power of an equal level. That's what guns are for.
When people started using guns, the world became equal. Suddenly old men and young men no longer were separated in terms of strength. A 90 year old geezer could cut down a 20 year old buck with a mere trigger pull. But looking beyond that, the use of guns has revolutionized our defenses. When hostiles break into an old woman's home, all she must do is point a gun at them and assure them she knows how to shoot. "Let's talk about Jesus until the police arrive, honey."
If you are one of those people who think that guns should be banned because they cause deaths, let me remind you that people are at fault, not the weapons they use. Take all the weapons away from man and he will beat each other to death with his bare fists. Then what will you blame?
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Feminism
I've had an itch about this subject for a long time. While the push for women's voting rights was probably the high of this controversy, the struggle has been going on for much longer than that.
What is feminism, really? What do feminists want? Most of their agendas proclaim 'freedom', 'equality' and 'rights'.
And they are certainly getting what they want. More and more, women are allowed into the same positions as men. The roles of both genders are beginning to blend, slowly but surely.
And yet the very things feminists once thought would improve their social standing has done just the opposite. Instead of giving them freedom, it has imprisoned them even more in this day and age.
Women and men are two different creatures. They are specifically designed to complement each other, and they do it perfectly. When a woman and man are bonded in marriage, their strengths and weaknesses cover each other's backs.
Along with that comes their roles. Women in general are designed weaker than men. Their minds are more colorful, creative. They are gentle, kind, soft. They are ideally suited for training the next generation. That is their speciality; the home.
Men, on the other hand, are powerful. Strong-willed. They have the ability to lead and protect others. Their main duty and job is to work for their families and protect the ones they love. They guide and direct their wives and children. That is their speciality; leadership.
What feminism has done by bringing women to the same level has men is disgusting. Women are not made to fight, to lead. I am not saying that they cannot protect those they care about. But today, with women allowed into direct combat - fighting alongside of men - it poses many problems. As well as women vying for positions of power. Again, I'm not saying that women should not have no control over the decisions that affect them. But they were not designed to lead. They influence their leaders by following. That is a truly privileged position to have.
Women are to be valued. They are precious. Each and every girl has what no man has and yet what every man needs; what is called 'a woman's touch'. Men can't live without women.
But now that women are the same as men...they are not special anymore. They are devalued, treated as nothing but objects of pleasure. Nothing but pretty things to look at. This is not what women should be treated as.
Women, you have a special role. We men need that. Help us out, huh?
Signing off!
What is feminism, really? What do feminists want? Most of their agendas proclaim 'freedom', 'equality' and 'rights'.
And they are certainly getting what they want. More and more, women are allowed into the same positions as men. The roles of both genders are beginning to blend, slowly but surely.
And yet the very things feminists once thought would improve their social standing has done just the opposite. Instead of giving them freedom, it has imprisoned them even more in this day and age.
Women and men are two different creatures. They are specifically designed to complement each other, and they do it perfectly. When a woman and man are bonded in marriage, their strengths and weaknesses cover each other's backs.
Along with that comes their roles. Women in general are designed weaker than men. Their minds are more colorful, creative. They are gentle, kind, soft. They are ideally suited for training the next generation. That is their speciality; the home.
Men, on the other hand, are powerful. Strong-willed. They have the ability to lead and protect others. Their main duty and job is to work for their families and protect the ones they love. They guide and direct their wives and children. That is their speciality; leadership.
What feminism has done by bringing women to the same level has men is disgusting. Women are not made to fight, to lead. I am not saying that they cannot protect those they care about. But today, with women allowed into direct combat - fighting alongside of men - it poses many problems. As well as women vying for positions of power. Again, I'm not saying that women should not have no control over the decisions that affect them. But they were not designed to lead. They influence their leaders by following. That is a truly privileged position to have.
Women are to be valued. They are precious. Each and every girl has what no man has and yet what every man needs; what is called 'a woman's touch'. Men can't live without women.
But now that women are the same as men...they are not special anymore. They are devalued, treated as nothing but objects of pleasure. Nothing but pretty things to look at. This is not what women should be treated as.
Women, you have a special role. We men need that. Help us out, huh?
Signing off!
The Controversial Clown's Rules
Welcome one and all, to the blog of Political Incorrectness!
The rules are simple.
1. Don't swear or cuss. That just makes you sound like a twelve-year-old playing Call of Duty, to quote Blimeycow. No one wants to hear it, and you're more mature than that.
2. Don't argue. You are welcome to share your views and opinions, but do not begin an arguement in the comment section. Do it somewhere else, please.
3. Regard posts as my opinions only. Please, don't generalize and apply my views to the group of people I classify with (Conservative Republican Evangelical Christian). If you have a problem with something I say, then keep that problem with me. Don't blame others. (There may be posts where I say 'we' and that is because what I am stating actually DOES apply to all the people I'm talking about, so please don't get confused)
4. Have fun. This is a blog of incorrectness, and you will probably find yourself offended at one point or another. Shrug it off! I'm here for you guys and only for you! Enjoy reading!
The rules are simple.
1. Don't swear or cuss. That just makes you sound like a twelve-year-old playing Call of Duty, to quote Blimeycow. No one wants to hear it, and you're more mature than that.
2. Don't argue. You are welcome to share your views and opinions, but do not begin an arguement in the comment section. Do it somewhere else, please.
3. Regard posts as my opinions only. Please, don't generalize and apply my views to the group of people I classify with (Conservative Republican Evangelical Christian). If you have a problem with something I say, then keep that problem with me. Don't blame others. (There may be posts where I say 'we' and that is because what I am stating actually DOES apply to all the people I'm talking about, so please don't get confused)
4. Have fun. This is a blog of incorrectness, and you will probably find yourself offended at one point or another. Shrug it off! I'm here for you guys and only for you! Enjoy reading!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)